PDA

View Full Version : Clinton supporters - Why do you want a Bush-Clinton dynasty?


redguard572001
05-06-2006, 05:11 AM
All the people that support Hillary Clinton...do you really want a ruling dynasty where 2 families stay in power for more than 25 years? I mean, come on. This is America, not Argentina (where the wife of the current president won an election). She's ambiguous on the issues - is she a conservative, moderate, liberal? She seems to want it all three ways. She's the most hawkish of any democrat - we'll probably go to war with Iran under her if Bush doesn't take us there first. How honest is she? Why does she not answer any question directly? Her answers just go back to Bush. Why did she take money from felons? Why are big companies her largest contributors?If she's such a tough woman, why did she tolerate being humiliated by an unfaithful husband? Giuliani's wife didn't put up with that. These are the questions I'd like to see other democrats ask her. Republicans froth at the mouth to run against her. It's because they think they can beat her.I'm not for a republican, unless Clinton is the nominee. I'm for change. She is not a change, she's more of the same. Oh, in 2004, I voted for Kerry, so I did my best. He just couldn't win.

BillH
05-07-2006, 04:55 PM
ABC baby. Anybody but clinton.

BD
05-09-2006, 04:39 AM
I'm not a Clinton supporter but I'll vote for her if the GOP doesn't do the right thing and nominate Huckabee or McCain.

hopefulforchange
05-10-2006, 04:23 PM
Perhaps, in terms of putting up with Bill's unfaithfulness and staying with him despite it all, she was trying to hold the family together because she was already having her own Oval Office dreams.We seem to favor candidates who are still married to their original spouses.The not answering a question directly factor annoys me as well. One reason why she's not in my top choices to vote for.

Dizz
05-12-2006, 04:07 AM
Didn't want the Bush part.Where were you when Bush was running?

SteveC
05-13-2006, 03:51 PM
Guliani kicked his wife out opf the mayor's mansion and moved in his mistress, so there was nothing to "put up" with. Hillary is not my choice, but I will vote for her over Guliani, Romney, or Thompson, as they are all foaming at the mouth to attack Iran. None of the other candidates answer questions directly either.

csjs536
05-15-2006, 03:35 AM
I don't believe there is one politician that will answer a question directly, they always go around them. Everything you are referring to is also applied to any politician, I'm sure.

DeactivatedAccount
05-16-2006, 03:19 PM
Let's compare what the two dynasties have done...Alot to a little.My answer is because, you got your second Bush, so we need our second Clinton to make it even.

theedge
05-18-2006, 03:03 AM
Why the heck not?? argentina has something similar, SO?by the way, big companies are ALWAYS the largest contributors.At the moment, the corporate world realise that another term with ANY republican means the end of the economy, so they're swinging to the other side.the republican gvt has killed the dollar, killed the national debt (over 9 000 trillions) and caused havoc indirectly in the liquidity market

thor_torkenson
05-19-2006, 02:47 PM
I would agree. People are screaming for change, but not voting for one.Like Monte Python says...and now, for something completely different...