GIRLS: Which of these two types would you rather have as a boyfriend?

[DragonflyGirl]

If you had the choice between these two different guys, which would you prefer?The first one is very ambitious, has a good job and a nice vehicle. He also has his own place and is quite good-looking. The problem is, he is rather arrogant and was a womanizer before you started dating him. You are not at all certain that he stopped that behavior once you started dating; in fact, your friends say they have seen him with other women. You never fully know if you can trust him.The second guy is quite a bit of a slacker. He doesn't have a job, yet he says that he is very willing to work and will get a job but has yet to do so. He doesn't have his own car or house. Yet he is completely head-over-heels in love with you, and you know beyond a doubt that he is one of the rare ones that would never in a million years cheat on you. He is also very handsome.No, I don't have two people that I'm trying to choose from, it's hypothetical. The rich cheater, or the faithful slacker?

[BrianaM]

none girl go for a great personality CUTE and is your match

[thatgirlkaytee]

Faithful slacker. At least he was trying. The rich cheater is just a set up for a money only relationship.

[NancyKay]

i'll take a pass on both of those lads...

[RachaelH]

the second guy!

[hiyaihopeicanhelp]

first would be nice but i would go for the second cause its more important that he is going to love ya and make you feel special.

[kplssk]

The rich cheater

[JoJo1590]

Um I think it comes down to who you love. Love conquers all I guess.xxx

[MissMarie]

If I was forced to choose I'd pick the faithful slacker...but in reality I would choose neither and be extremely happy in my single life

[cookiemonster]

the faithful slacker because if he loved someone he woud do anything for them including getting a job and started his life up.

[FaZizzle]

Neither--if you can't trust the cheater, then it's not going to work. But if you dated a slacker, you wouldn't be able to trust him with your money.

[glennwalker1971]

neither, there are plenty of good guys out there.

[IndependentMocha]

I say neither!

[AmyR]

Neither one is prime real estate, but I would go witht the slacker - the slacker might get a life with a little encuragement, but the arrogant womanizer will be that way forever.

[Ashley]

That's tough. I like the one that's faithful, but not the slacker part.

[gtfobitchh]

The second one hands down. I'm just waiting for mine to come along

[space_girl_1010]

personally I wouldn't take either of them. Not my type. If I HAD to choose one it would be the second guy because of him being in toal love with me. I know he would always treat me well. With the first guy being a womanizer before, I would be leary that he would do it again..and I wouldn't be his number one.

[Deanri]

The faithful slacker. I'm independent and I could take care of myself. I would rather be with someone that I always know where I stand rather than the constant drama and chaos of wondering what guy number 1 is going to do.

[swddrb]

their both losers

[sunshinesmoothoperator]

You are actually provoking woman to settle. Shame on you girl.I wouldn't settle for either one of those guys. I want a guy that has all the qualifications the one on top has and put me on a pedestal. Woman need to stop settling.

[jessandjon05]

the faithful slacker, ANY DAY!!!!!

[suzy]

The faithful slacker, cuz it's better to have love and devotion than material things. Just my opinion.

[Sweetnesspersonified786]

Definitely the second!Money is nothing, compared to love!

[BonesofaTeacher]

run away from both. neither is a good choice. you can find a relationship where your partner is responsible and doesn't cheat. love does not make up for not taking responsibility. money does not make up for lack of trust. run away from both.

[srednjokolka]

the faithful slacker 100%

[MCM]

Definately the second one...I would choose love over money any day :]

[jennifer]

second onei'd rather have someone who loves me than someone who just buys my love

[chelsea]

faithful slacker. BUT if he didn't start getting up some ambition i would have to say goodbye. the key words you used were "he is one of the rare ones". you can find a rich cheating snob anywhere and everywhere, they're a dime a dozen. its those few that have feelings and a heart to share that you need to look out for.

[starr]

faithful slacker; no guy is worth dating if he is going to cheat on you

[Purity]

faithful slacker

[yeahimhisbejealous]

i would probably pick the faithful slacker b/c if he really loved me and cared about me he wouldn't slack as much and he would find a job and a house.

[rotorhead]

Pass on both. Guys don't fall into just those 2 categories. Ones a jerk the other a bum. Find one who is neither.

[KiwiTiwi]

well, honestly i would tell u go with what u feel in your heart! your judges everything for u.but honestly i think that i would choose the second guy.

[BeenThereDoneThat9873]

A faithful slacker........Been there done that with the Rich Womanizing Cheat.....They Never Stop!!!!!

[Hawkeye]

wow, i'm glad those two aren't the only types in the world. it might be hard to find a hard working, faithful awesome man, but it's worth waiting and looking.

[pj]

If your looking for nothing but a good time and no real relationship...The rich guy.If your looking for love and or loyalty? the slacker.

[Lynn]

Neither. They both have issues.

[lotsandlots]

The faithful slacker........... You can help him develop in to a rich man or he will help you develop in to a rich woman. A cheating man will be a distraction forever you will never be able to fully focus on your goals, yo will alway be trying to please him. The slacker will try to please you..........

[taterbabie_4u]

i would take the faithful slacker.........then i just might go with the rich cheater and just play him before he plays me.............

[DartSwinger]

My wife used to be married to the rich cheater. Now she's married to me, the faithful poor working guy (not a slacker).

[metalgods]

This is a tough question! Gosh...I'd take the first one, at least I can guard my heart while he takes me out since he's able to afford it...and just enjoy it while it lasts

[luv2ugrl]

Neither one, there are plenty of available men out there

[mikah_smiles]

I'd rather have the slacker for a boyfriend. At least that would take some of the pressure of wondering whether or not he was cheating. However, I wouldn't consider dating him seriously or in the long term. I've had slacker boyfriends and after a while, they get old pretty quickly.

[loved_0506]

neither!

[kg]

Neither,guy # 1) because you don't want to be cheated on & guy # 2) the relationship prolly wouldn't last with him because you'll eventually get tired of trying to be his momma

[angels_kiss321]

Faithful Slacker. Why? Faithful is the best thing you can get from a man and also real passion for eachother. Whats causing him to slack could be depressed or sad.

[KaelynBradley]

the first guy because he sounds responsible and more caring.

[BaybiiGiirl-x-]

Omg The Rich One... Deffo.If The Second Guy Did Cheat On You You Would Be More Sad Because You Wont Expect It..x

[hindergirl17]

The faithful slacker because you know you can trust a guy like and i least he is trying and you don't have to worry about him cheating on you like the rich cheater.

[CrystalJ]

faithful slacker..of course.because if he truly loves you he'll change and geta job and make it work.love is beautiful yet mysterious.nice question.=]-crystal from LA

[KuWaTie]

ppl change soo if the first one is smart enough to be rich and get all of these stuff you should be smart enough to make him only look at u and no one else ;) and the 2nd will if hes willing to work then one day he might be as rich as the first one ;) they both require paitince ;D